Loading market view
Loading market view
Loading correlations
Xometry, Inc. Class A Common Stock (XMTR) vs Labor Force Participation
Correlation
of % moves
-23%
In sync
of periods
36%
History
monthsmonths · through 2026-08
59
These move in the same direction about 36% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly mirror each other (~5% of the pattern is shared).
A real but noisy link — useful as context, risky as a standalone signal.
On a log scale so equal % moves take equal vertical space — best when one series has grown much faster than the other.
What to Watch
Labor Force Participation moves ~14 months before XMTR
Watch Labor Force Participation for an early read on XMTR.
Holds in both up and down markets
The relationship is similar whether prices are rising or falling — reliable in both directions.
Flips between sync and inverse
Sometimes the two move together, sometimes opposite. Don't treat this as a stable signal.
Explore
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
36%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
-23%
Based on % moves
95% CI
-47% → +3%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
59 paired data points survived the monthly window.
Raw input
1,254
943
Normalized
1,254
943
Prepared
61
943
Aligned
59
59
Invalid removed
R²(i)
5%
Variance explained
Significance
n.s.
Statistical confidence
Data points(i)
57
Thin
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -18 to 18 months.
Selected shift
-14 months
Correlation at this shift
-35%
+12% stronger than no-shift baseline
Labor Force Participation shifted 14 months later. Reads: "Does Xometry, Inc. Class A Common Stock (XMTR) today line up with Labor Force Participation 14 months ago?"
34 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
-23%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
-14 months
-35%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+18%
9 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
-24%
7 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-51%
41 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
886
A: 2 / B: 884
Series A
Xometry, Inc. Class A Common Stock (XMTR)
XMTR
Stock · 1,254 raw → 61 prepared
Series B
Labor Force Participation
CIVPART
FRED · 943 raw → 943 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
4
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
-0.0022
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
-0.0000
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 5 months ago · ID: fred-civpart_stock-xmtr_monthly_5y
Explore
Top 10 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.