Loading market view
Loading market view
Loading correlations
Correlation
of % moves
+26%
In sync
of periods
62%
History
daysdays · through 2026-07-09
500
These move in the same direction about 62% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly line up (~7% of the pattern is shared).
A real but noisy link — useful as context, risky as a standalone signal.
On a log scale so equal % moves take equal vertical space — best when one series has grown much faster than the other.
What to Watch
Slipping tighter
The recent pattern is tighter than its long-run baseline — keep an eye on whether this sticks.
Holds in both up and down markets
The relationship is similar whether prices are rising or falling — reliable in both directions.
Mostly stable
The relationship drifts a little but stays in the same neighbourhood.
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
62%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+26%
Based on % moves
95% CI
N/A
Likely range
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
500 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
1,254
729
Normalized
1,254
729
Prepared
1,254
729
Aligned
500
500
Invalid removed
7%
Variance explained
Significance
N/A
Statistical confidence
Data points(i)
499
Robust
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+26%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
499 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+26%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+26%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+3%
74 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+6%
84 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-42%
91 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
983
A: 754 / B: 229
Series A
Global X Uranium ETF (URA)
URA
Stock · 1,254 raw → 1,254 prepared
Series B
Stellar (XLM)
XLM
Crypto · 729 raw → 729 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
11
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
0.5142
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
0.0012
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 3 months ago · ID: crypto-xlm_stock-ura_daily_5y