SeriesMagCorrSyncOverlapThrough
Correlation
+63%
of % moves
In sync
72%
of periods
History
944
days · through 2026-05-06
These move in the same direction about 72% of the time
Their swing sizes loosely line up (~39% of the pattern is shared).
Strong enough to use as a signal — check the stability and regime notes below before relying on it.
Time Series
Both lines start at the same point — easy to compare when growth rates are similar.
What to Watch
Slipping looser
The recent pattern is looser than its long-run baseline — keep an eye on whether this sticks.
Tighter in drawdowns
The relationship is stronger when both prices are falling than when both are rising — typical risk-off behaviour.
Rock solid
The relationship barely changes from period to period — treat it as a reliable signal.
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
72.0%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+63%
Based on % moves
95% CI
+59% → +66%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
944 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
944
1,255
Normalized
944
1,255
Prepared
944
1,255
Aligned
944
944
Invalid removed
Explore
R²(i)
39.4%
Variance explained
Significance
p < 0.001
Statistical confidence
Data points
944
Deep
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+63%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
944 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+63%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+63%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+47%
105 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+72%
94 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-31%
50 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
311
A: 0 / B: 311
Series A
RITM
Stock · 944 raw → 944 prepared
Series B
SPHD
Stock · 1,255 raw → 1,255 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
21
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
1.8845
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
26.0716
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 4 days ago · ID: stock-ritm_stock-sphd_5y
Explore
Top 5 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.