Correlation
of % moves
+11%
In sync
of periods
50%
History
daysdays · through 2026-05-07
240
These move in the same direction about 50% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly line up (~1% of the pattern is shared).
Roughly random — these don't track each other in a meaningful way.
On a log scale so equal % moves take equal vertical space — best when one series has grown much faster than the other.
What to Watch
NAKA moves ~3 days before ONC
Watch NAKA for an early read on ONC.
Tighter in drawdowns
The relationship is stronger when both prices are falling than when both are rising — typical risk-off behaviour.
Mostly stable
The relationship drifts a little but stays in the same neighbourhood.
Explore
Advanced
Statistics
Approximate (legacy record)In sync(i)
49.8%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+11%
Based on % moves
95% CI
N/A
Likely range
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
240 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
337
240
Normalized
337
240
Prepared
337
240
Aligned
240
240
Invalid removed
R²(i)
1.2%
Variance explained
Significance
N/A
Statistical confidence
Data points
240
Usable
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
-3 days
Correlation at this shift
-17%
+6% stronger than no-shift baseline
NAKA shifted 3 days later. Reads: "Does ONC today line up with NAKA 3 days ago?"
236 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+11%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
-3 days
-17%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+4%
41 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+27%
77 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-28%
121 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
97
A: 97 / B: 0
Series A
ONC
Stock · 337 raw → 337 prepared
Series B
NAKA
Stock · 240 raw → 240 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
15
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
0.4819
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
-0.0208
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 4 days ago · ID: stock-naka_stock-onc_5y
Explore
Top 10 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.