Loading market view
Loading market view
Loading correlations
Correlation
of % moves
+26%
In sync
of periods
57%
History
daysdays · through 2026-09-23
690
These move in the same direction about 57% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly line up (~7% of the pattern is shared).
A faint pattern — interesting as colour, not strong enough to act on alone.
Both lines start at the same point — easy to compare when growth rates are similar.
What to Watch
Tighter in drawdowns
The relationship is stronger when both prices are falling than when both are rising — typical risk-off behaviour.
Rock solid
The relationship barely changes from period to period — treat it as a reliable signal.
Explore
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
57%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+26%
Based on % moves
95% CI
+19% → +33%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
690 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
1,253
690
Normalized
1,253
690
Prepared
1,253
690
Aligned
690
690
Invalid removed
R²(i)
7%
Variance explained
Significance
p < 0.001
Statistical confidence
Data points(i)
689
Robust
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+26%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
689 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+26%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+26%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+26%
86 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+48%
71 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-51%
88 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
563
A: 563 / B: 0
Series A
Loews Corporation (L)
L
Stock · 1,253 raw → 1,253 prepared
Series B
Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT)
OILT
Stock · 690 raw → 690 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
13
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
0.4203
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
0.0001
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 2 weeks ago · ID: stock-l_stock-oilt_daily_5y
Explore
Top 10 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.