Loading market view
Loading market view
Loading correlations
Correlation
of % moves
+33%
In sync
of periods
64%
History
daysdays · through 2025-04-24
898
These move in the same direction about 64% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly line up (~11% of the pattern is shared).
A real but noisy link — useful as context, risky as a standalone signal.
On a log scale so equal % moves take equal vertical space — best when one series has grown much faster than the other.
What to Watch
Holds in both up and down markets
The relationship is similar whether prices are rising or falling — reliable in both directions.
Explore
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
64%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+33%
Based on % moves
95% CI
+27% → +39%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
898 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
898
1,253
Normalized
898
1,253
Prepared
898
1,253
Aligned
898
898
Invalid removed
R²(i)
11%
Variance explained
Significance
p < 0.001
Statistical confidence
Data points(i)
897
Deep
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+33%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
897 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+33%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+33%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+12%
65 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+25%
102 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-31%
51 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
355
A: 0 / B: 355
Series A
MKFG
Stock · 898 raw → 898 prepared
Series B
IWM
Stock · 1,253 raw → 1,253 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
15
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
0.0866
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
0.0001
Linear regression intercept.
Saved last month · ID: stock-iwm_stock-mkfg_daily_5y
Explore
Top 10 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.