Loading market view
Loading market view
Loading correlations
Correlation
of values
-36%
In sync
of periods
47%
History
monthsmonths · through 2026-05
605
These move in the same direction about 47% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly mirror each other (~13% of the pattern is shared).
Roughly random — these don't track each other in a meaningful way.
On a log scale so equal % moves take equal vertical space — best when one series has grown much faster than the other.
What to Watch
Tighter in drawdowns
The relationship is stronger when both prices are falling than when both are rising — typical risk-off behaviour.
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
47.3%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
-36%
Based on values
95% CI
-43% → -29%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
605 paired data points survived the monthly window.
Raw input
3,100
605
Normalized
3,100
605
Prepared
713
605
Aligned
605
605
Invalid removed
R²(i)
13.0%
Variance explained
Significance
p < 0.001
Statistical confidence
Data points
605
Robust
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -18 to 18 months.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
-36%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
605 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
-36%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
-36%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+31%
8 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+58%
8 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-68%
31 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
108
A: 108 / B: 0
Series A
Initial Jobless Claims
ICSA
FRED · 3,100 raw → 713 prepared
Series B
Total Vehicle Sales
TOTALSA
FRED · 605 raw → 605 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
42
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
-0.0000
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
16.4638
Linear regression intercept.
Saved last month · ID: fred-icsa_fred-totalsa_monthly_5y