SeriesMagCorrSyncOverlapThrough
Correlation
+39%
of values
In sync
52%
of periods
History
711
months · through 2026-03
These move in the same direction about 52% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly line up (~15% of the pattern is shared).
Roughly random — these don't track each other in a meaningful way.
Time Series
Both lines start at the same point — easy to compare when growth rates are similar.
What to Watch
Holds in both up and down markets
The relationship is similar whether prices are rising or falling — reliable in both directions.
Flips between sync and inverse
Sometimes the two move together, sometimes opposite. Don't treat this as a stable signal.
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
52.1%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+39%
Based on values
95% CI
+33% → +45%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
711 paired data points survived the monthly window.
Raw input
3,095
807
Normalized
3,095
807
Prepared
712
807
Aligned
711
711
Invalid removed
Explore
R²(i)
15.3%
Variance explained
Significance
p < 0.001
Statistical confidence
Data points
711
Robust
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -18 to 18 months.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+39%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
711 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+39%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+39%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+98%
54 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+83%
67 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-51%
128 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
97
A: 1 / B: 96
Series A
Initial Jobless Claims
ICSA
FRED · 3,095 raw → 712 prepared
Series B
Personal Savings Rate
PSAVERT
FRED · 807 raw → 807 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
40
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
0.0000
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
5.8339
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 3 days ago · ID: fred-icsa_fred-psavert_5y
Explore
Top 5 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.