Correlation
of % moves
+49%
In sync
of periods
65%
History
daysdays · through 2026-05-01
1,084
These move in the same direction about 65% of the time
Their swing sizes loosely line up (~24% of the pattern is shared).
A real but noisy link — useful as context, risky as a standalone signal.
On a log scale so equal % moves take equal vertical space — best when one series has grown much faster than the other.
What to Watch
Tighter in drawdowns
The relationship is stronger when both prices are falling than when both are rising — typical risk-off behaviour.
Swings around
Their relationship swings around — sometimes tight, sometimes loose. Don't trust a single snapshot.
Explore
Advanced
Statistics
Approximate (legacy record)In sync(i)
64.7%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+49%
Based on % moves
95% CI
N/A
Likely range
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
1,084 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
1,088
13,927
Normalized
1,088
13,927
Prepared
1,088
13,927
Aligned
1,084
1,084
Invalid removed
R²(i)
24.2%
Variance explained
Significance
N/A
Statistical confidence
Data points
1,084
Deep
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+49%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
249 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+49%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+49%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+15%
99 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+51%
81 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-56%
69 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
12,847
A: 4 / B: 12843
Series A
GBTC
Stock · 1,088 raw → 1,088 prepared
Series B
NASDAQ Composite
NASDAQCOM
FRED · 13,927 raw → 13,927 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
11
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
0.2599
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
0.0013
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 4 days ago · ID: fred-nasdaqcom_stock-gbtc_5y
Explore
Top 10 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.