Loading market view
Loading market view
Loading correlations
Correlation
of values
-79%
In sync
of periods
53%
History
monthsmonths · through 2026-05
592
These move in the same direction about 53% of the time
When one swings, the other often swings by a similar amount in the opposite direction (~62% of the pattern is shared).
Roughly random — these don't track each other in a meaningful way.
Both lines start at the same point — easy to compare when growth rates are similar.
What to Watch
Tighter in drawdowns
The relationship is stronger when both prices are falling than when both are rising — typical risk-off behaviour.
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
53%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
-79%
Based on values
95% CI
N/A
Likely range
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
592 paired data points survived the monthly window.
Raw input
809
12,341
Normalized
809
12,341
Prepared
809
594
Aligned
592
592
Invalid removed
62%
Variance explained
Significance
N/A
Statistical confidence
Data points(i)
592
Robust
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -18 to 18 months.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
-79%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
592 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
-79%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
-79%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+6%
22 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+52%
12 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-37%
26 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
219
A: 217 / B: 2
Series A
Personal Consumption
PCE
FRED · 809 raw → 809 prepared
Series B
30Y Treasury Yield
DGS30
FRED · 12,341 raw → 594 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
3
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
-0.0004
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
9.7242
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 3 months ago · ID: fred-dgs30_fred-pce_monthly_5y