Correlation
of % moves
+17%
In sync
of periods
51%
History
daysdays · through 2026-05-07
240
These move in the same direction about 51% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly line up (~3% of the pattern is shared).
Roughly random — these don't track each other in a meaningful way.
On a log scale so equal % moves take equal vertical space — best when one series has grown much faster than the other.
What to Watch
Slipping looser
The recent pattern is looser than its long-run baseline — keep an eye on whether this sticks.
Holds in both up and down markets
The relationship is similar whether prices are rising or falling — reliable in both directions.
Mostly stable
The relationship drifts a little but stays in the same neighbourhood.
Explore
Advanced
Statistics
Approximate (legacy record)In sync(i)
50.6%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+17%
Based on % moves
95% CI
N/A
Likely range
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
240 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
1,255
240
Normalized
1,255
240
Prepared
1,255
240
Aligned
240
240
Invalid removed
R²(i)
2.7%
Variance explained
Significance
N/A
Statistical confidence
Data points
240
Usable
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+17%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
239 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+17%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+17%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+17%
50 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
-2%
70 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-17%
119 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
1,015
A: 1015 / B: 0
Series A
CTVA
Stock · 1,255 raw → 1,255 prepared
Series B
NAKA
Stock · 240 raw → 240 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
5
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
1.3016
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
-0.0210
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 4 days ago · ID: stock-ctva_stock-naka_5y
Explore
Top 10 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.