SeriesMagCorrSyncOverlapThrough
Correlation
-12%
of % moves
In sync
55%
of periods
History
285
days · through 2026-05-06
These move opposite each other about 55% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly mirror each other (~2% of the pattern is shared).
A faint pattern — interesting as colour, not strong enough to act on alone.
Time Series
On a log scale so equal % moves take equal vertical space — best when one series has grown much faster than the other.
What to Watch
Tighter in drawdowns
The relationship is stronger when both prices are falling than when both are rising — typical risk-off behaviour.
Swings around
Their relationship swings around — sometimes tight, sometimes loose. Don't trust a single snapshot.
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
55.4%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
-12%
Based on % moves
95% CI
-24% → -1%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
285 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
1,255
285
Normalized
1,255
285
Prepared
1,255
285
Aligned
285
285
Invalid removed
Explore
R²(i)
1.5%
Variance explained
Significance
p < 0.05
Statistical confidence
Data points
285
Robust
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
-12%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
285 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
-12%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
-12%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+33%
73 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+56%
64 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-44%
112 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
970
A: 970 / B: 0
Series A
CTVA
Stock · 1,255 raw → 1,255 prepared
Series B
NAGE
Stock · 285 raw → 285 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
21
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
-0.0481
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
11.1744
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 2 hours ago · ID: stock-ctva_stock-nage_5y
Explore
Top 5 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.