Correlation
of % moves
+59%
In sync
of periods
69%
History
daysdays · through 2026-05-07
1,255
These move in the same direction about 69% of the time
Their swing sizes loosely line up (~35% of the pattern is shared).
Strong enough to use as a signal — check the stability and regime notes below before relying on it.
Both lines start at the same point — easy to compare when growth rates are similar.
What to Watch
Holds in both up and down markets
The relationship is similar whether prices are rising or falling — reliable in both directions.
Rock solid
The relationship barely changes from period to period — treat it as a reliable signal.
Explore
Advanced
Statistics
Approximate (legacy record)In sync(i)
69.0%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+59%
Based on % moves
95% CI
N/A
Likely range
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
1,255 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
1,255
1,255
Normalized
1,255
1,255
Prepared
1,255
1,255
Aligned
1,255
1,255
Invalid removed
R²(i)
35.2%
Variance explained
Significance
N/A
Statistical confidence
Data points
1,255
Deep
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+59%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
249 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+59%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+59%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+30%
104 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+30%
85 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-57%
60 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Series A
CTAS
Stock · 1,255 raw → 1,255 prepared
Series B
SCHD
Stock · 1,255 raw → 1,255 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
3
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
0.4000
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
-0.0002
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 2 days ago · ID: stock-ctas_stock-schd_5y
Explore
Top 10 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.