Loading market view
Loading market view
Loading correlations
Correlation
of % moves
+44%
In sync
of periods
65%
History
daysdays · through 2026-09-04
1,156
These move in the same direction about 65% of the time
Their swing sizes loosely line up (~19% of the pattern is shared).
A real but noisy link — useful as context, risky as a standalone signal.
On a log scale so equal % moves take equal vertical space — best when one series has grown much faster than the other.
What to Watch
Decouples in drawdowns
The relationship weakens when both prices are falling — don't count on this pair as a hedge under stress.
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
65%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+44%
Based on % moves
95% CI
+39% → +48%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
1,156 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
1,253
1,156
Normalized
1,253
1,156
Prepared
1,253
1,156
Aligned
1,156
1,156
Invalid removed
R²(i)
19%
Variance explained
Significance
p < 0.001
Statistical confidence
Data points(i)
1,155
Deep
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+44%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
1,155 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+44%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+44%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+78%
60 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+53%
60 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-46%
41 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
97
A: 97 / B: 0
Series A
EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME)
EME
Stock · 1,253 raw → 1,253 prepared
Series B
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares (CRDO)
CRDO
Stock · 1,156 raw → 1,156 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
7
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
1.0342
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
0.0006
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 4 months ago · ID: stock-crdo_stock-eme_daily_5y