SeriesMagCorrSyncOverlapThrough
Correlation
of % moves
+32%
In sync
of periods
63%
History
daysdays · through 2026-05-06
921
These move in the same direction about 63% of the time
Their swing sizes only faintly line up (~11% of the pattern is shared).
A real but noisy link — useful as context, risky as a standalone signal.
Both lines start at the same point — easy to compare when growth rates are similar.
What to Watch
Unusual right now
Recently tighter than usual — the pair is behaving differently than its long-run pattern.
Holds in both up and down markets
The relationship is similar whether prices are rising or falling — reliable in both directions.
Rock solid
The relationship barely changes from period to period — treat it as a reliable signal.
Explore
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
63.5%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+32%
Based on % moves
95% CI
+27% → +38%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
921 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
1,254
921
Normalized
1,254
921
Prepared
1,254
921
Aligned
921
921
Invalid removed
R²(i)
10.5%
Variance explained
Significance
p < 0.001
Statistical confidence
Data points
921
Deep
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+32%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
921 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+32%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+32%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+36%
100 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+34%
91 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-43%
58 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
333
A: 333 / B: 0
Series A
CF
Stock · 1,254 raw → 1,254 prepared
Series B
PR
Stock · 921 raw → 921 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
38
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
0.0728
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
7.3040
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 3 hours ago · ID: stock-cf_stock-pr_5y
Explore
Top 10 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.