Correlation
of % moves
+52%
In sync
of periods
62%
History
daysdays · through 2026-05-06
1,152
These move in the same direction about 62% of the time
Their swing sizes loosely line up (~27% of the pattern is shared).
A real but noisy link — useful as context, risky as a standalone signal.
Both lines start at the same point — easy to compare when growth rates are similar.
What to Watch
Holds in both up and down markets
The relationship is similar whether prices are rising or falling — reliable in both directions.
Rock solid
The relationship barely changes from period to period — treat it as a reliable signal.
Explore
Advanced
Statistics
In sync(i)
61.9%
Headline metric
Movement correlation(i)
+52%
Based on % moves
95% CI
+47% → +56%
Likely range of correlation
Pipeline
Pipeline Summary
1,152 paired data points survived the daily window.
Raw input
1,152
1,254
Normalized
1,152
1,254
Prepared
1,152
1,254
Aligned
1,152
1,152
Invalid removed
R²(i)
26.7%
Variance explained
Significance
p < 0.001
Statistical confidence
Data points
1,152
Deep
Time-Shifted Correlation
See how correlation changes when one series is offset in time. A taller bar at a non-zero shift means the two move together better when one leads the other — that's a potential lead/lag signal.
Correlation by shift
Click a bar to inspect. Range: -6 to 6 days.
Selected shift
No shift
Correlation at this shift
+52%
No shift — both series at their actual dates.
1,152 overlapping points at this shift
Baseline
+52%
No-shift correlation, matching the main time-series chart above.
Peak shift
No shift
+52%
A non-zero peak suggests one series lines up better when shifted against the other.
Stability
How the correlation evolves over time. A stable line means the relationship is reliable; large swings signal regime-dependent behavior.
Do They Crash Together?
How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.
Both Rising
+46%
93 periods · Return correlation when both series rose
Both Falling
+53%
80 periods · Return correlation when both series fell
Diverging
-52%
76 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart
Scatter
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Duplicates removed
0
A: 0 / B: 0
Alignment drops
102
A: 0 / B: 102
Series A
CTRA
Stock · 1,152 raw → 1,152 prepared
Series B
BG
Stock · 1,254 raw → 1,254 prepared
Sign agreement
100.0%
How often both values share the same sign.
Zero crossings
53
Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.
Slope
2.1986
Linear regression slope.
Intercept
38.8679
Linear regression intercept.
Saved 3 hours ago · ID: stock-bg_stock-ctra_5y
Explore
Top 10 by absolute correlation
Ranked across both sides of this comparison using the same dense row format as the single-symbol correlations view.