CorrlensCorrlens
Correlate

Correlation Analysis

Energy Transfer LP Common Units representing limited partner interests vs JPMorgan Chase & Co.

ET vs JPM

+0.812

Strong positive

When one moves up, the other tends to follow.

ET logo

Energy Transfer LP Common Units representing limited partner interests

ET

Energy Transfer is a diversified midstream firm, operating from wellhead to consuming demand. It handles natural gas, natural gas liquids, or NGLs, crude oil, and refined products. Commodities are moved through its network of field level gathering and processing to refineries and demand centers. Operations are concentrated in Texas and the Midcontinent United States. It also controls Sunoco and USA Compression through its general partner relationship.

Market cap 65.2B · 22,311 employees

JPM logo

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

JPM

JPMorgan Chase is one of the largest and most complex financial institutions in the United States, with more than $4.4 trillion in assets. It is organized into four major segments: consumer and community banking, corporate and investment banking, commercial banking, and asset and wealth management. JPMorgan operates and is subject to regulation in multiple countries.

Market cap 792.5B

Apr 9, 2021 — Apr 7, 2026Daily1,254 data pointsStockStockFinancials

Time Series

Relative Performance

Green: ETGray: JPM36 of 1,254 points (sampled)

Who Moves First

in sync

ET and JPM tend to move at the same time.

After testing 13 timing shifts, the strongest relationship was +0.812 (they moved in the same direction).

Do They Crash Together?

Correlation by Market Regime

How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.

Both Rising

+0.282

15 periods · Return correlation when both series rose

Both Falling

+0.895

6 periods · Return correlation when both series fell

Diverging

-0.729

14 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart

R-Squared

66.0%

Share of variance in one series explained by the other.

Trend Agreement

61.5%

How often both series moved in the same direction period-to-period.

Overlap Quality

1,254

Deep shared window — 1,254 usable pairs.

Significance

p < 0.001

95% CI: [0.792, 0.830]

Scatter

XY Regression

7.1810121416182020.7698.3100150200250300333.4Energy Transfer LP Common Units representing limited partner interestsJPMorgan Chase & Co.Data pointsFit (r = 0.812)

Pipeline

Data quality details

Pipeline Summary

1,254 paired data points survived the daily window.

Raw input

1,254

1,254

Normalized

1,254

1,254

Prepared

1,254

1,254

Aligned

1,254

1,254

Invalid removed

0

A: 0 / B: 0

Duplicates removed

0

A: 0 / B: 0

Alignment drops

0

A: 0 / B: 0

Series A

ET logo

Energy Transfer LP Common Units representing limited partner interests

ET

Market cap 65.2B · 22,311 employees

Stock · 1,254 raw → 1,254 prepared

Series B

JPM logo

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

JPM

Market cap 792.5B

Stock · 1,254 raw → 1,254 prepared

Sign agreement

100.0%

How often both values share the same sign.

Zero crossings

7

Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.

Slope

15.7053

Linear regression slope.

Intercept

-28.0546

Linear regression intercept.

Related Extremes

Highest and Lowest Correlated

Saved 6 hours ago · ID: stock-et-vs-stock-jpm-daily