CorrlensCorrlens
Correlate

Correlation Analysis

Curtiss-Wright Corp. vs Micron Technology, Inc.

CW vs MU

+0.840

Strong positive

When one moves up, the other tends to follow.

CW logo

Curtiss-Wright Corp.

CW

Curtiss-Wright Corporation delivers engineered products and services to commercial, defence, power generation, and other industrial markets. It offers industrial vehicle components, control systems, weapons handling systems, pumps, valves, and other solutions. The company has three reportable segments based on the markets serviced: Naval & Power, which provides coolant pumps, power-dense compact motors, generators, secondary propulsion systems, pumps, pump seals, valves, control rod drive mechanisms, and fastening systems that also generate maximum revenue for the company; its other segments are Aerospace & Industrial and Defense Electronics. Geographically, the company generates its key revenue from the United States of America, followed by the United Kingdom and other countries.

Market cap 25.8B · 9,100 employees

MU logo

Micron Technology, Inc.

MU

Micron is one of the largest semiconductor companies in the world, specializing in memory and storage chips. Its primary revenue stream comes from dynamic random access memory, or DRAM, and it also has minority exposure to not-and or NAND, flash chips. Micron serves a global customer base, selling chips into data centers, mobile phones, consumer electronics, and industrial and automotive applications. The firm is vertically integrated.

Market cap 426B · 53,000 employees

Apr 9, 2021 — Apr 7, 2026Daily1,254 data pointsStockStockTechnology

Time Series

Relative Performance

Green: CWGray: MU36 of 1,254 points (sampled)

Who Moves First

in sync

CW and MU tend to move at the same time.

After testing 13 timing shifts, the strongest relationship was +0.840 (they moved in the same direction).

Do They Crash Together?

Correlation by Market Regime

How these series behave when markets are rising, falling, or diverging. A correlation that holds in drawdowns is very different from one that only works in rallies.

Both Rising

+0.630

13 periods · Return correlation when both series rose

Both Falling

+0.803

8 periods · Return correlation when both series fell

Diverging

-0.849

14 periods · Return correlation when series moved apart

R-Squared

70.6%

Share of variance in one series explained by the other.

Trend Agreement

61.3%

How often both series moved in the same direction period-to-period.

Overlap Quality

1,254

Deep shared window — 1,254 usable pairs.

Significance

p < 0.001

95% CI: [0.823, 0.856]

Scatter

XY Regression

6610020030040050060070074722100200300400443Curtiss-Wright Corp.Micron Technology, Inc.Data pointsFit (r = 0.84)

Pipeline

Data quality details

Pipeline Summary

1,254 paired data points survived the daily window.

Raw input

1,254

1,254

Normalized

1,254

1,254

Prepared

1,254

1,254

Aligned

1,254

1,254

Invalid removed

0

A: 0 / B: 0

Duplicates removed

0

A: 0 / B: 0

Alignment drops

0

A: 0 / B: 0

Series A

CW logo

Curtiss-Wright Corp.

CW

Market cap 25.8B · 9,100 employees

Stock · 1,254 raw → 1,254 prepared

Series B

MU logo

Micron Technology, Inc.

MU

Market cap 426B · 53,000 employees

Stock · 1,254 raw → 1,254 prepared

Sign agreement

100.0%

How often both values share the same sign.

Zero crossings

1

Estimated crossover points between normalized spreads.

Slope

0.4174

Linear regression slope.

Intercept

-4.6103

Linear regression intercept.

Related Extremes

Highest and Lowest Correlated

Saved 7 hours ago · ID: stock-cw-vs-stock-mu-daily